Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Céline Artaud's avatar

This is devastating in the amazing, competent way only you seem to manage, Museguided, yes, but also unsentimental, almost prosecutorial. You don’t console the reader; you subpoena them. And somehow make that feel like care.

You ask, finally, the only question that matters: What is one thing you can no longer pretend not to know?

For me, reading this, it was this: that I have been using explanation as a substitute for choice. If I can narrate why something hasn’t happened, contextualise it, intellectualise it, give it a lineage, I don’t have to cross the uglier threshold of deciding. Your essay made it painfully clear that fluency is not the same as honesty, and insight is not the same as entry. I’ve been very articulate at the edge of my own life.

What I admire the most is how you refuse the usual December binaries—despair vs hope, collapse vs reinvention—and instead locate something colder and truer: pressure. Not motivation. Not inspiration. Compression. The sense that the year hasn’t failed us so much as stopped indulging our rehearsals. That line about imagined futures lining up as witnesses rather than accusers is exacting and original. You reframe regret as evidence. Evidence of attention misallocated.

And the Paris dusk, oh, how I miss my city, is a masterstroke… that December clarity is the anesthesia wearing off. Possibility sobers up. What’s left isn’t bleak; it’s precise. That precision, as you suggest, may be the only real kindness time offers.

This didn’t make me want to “do better”.

It made me want to stop pretending I don’t already know where the bargain has gone bad.

Which feels like exactly your point.

Tamara, thank you for a year in which I’ve grown and evolved beyond my imagination thanks to your essays!

AGK's avatar

The real thing being exposed in the December audit is the clash of desire against grandiosity. We have, both an unlimited capacity to want, and therefore remain unsatisfied, as well as unlimited optimism, or maybe delusion, that next year will be different. This recurrence stems from exactly what you pinpoint: the belief that time is linear and progressive, not cyclical. Inherent to the progressive paradigm is the presupposition that things must get better in some measurable way, otherwise you've failed or are stagnant. This completely contradicts our lived experience of never quite being satisfied; of always wanting more, yet remaining stuck in a loop of reactivity and unmet expectations. What's grandiose is our absolute certainty in linear time, and our expectation that next year will be the year we turn things around, despite "failing" to do so in every previous year.

I love your framing of touching your life instead of living it; organizing the book collection instead of reading it. This is why selling programs or memberships or seminars is so effective, and it's why people love to obsessively plan and resolve: it gives us the illusion of progress or productivity; it makes us feel closer to our goals without actually walking down the path, and it's psychologically comforting because every step forward is a step you will need to retread when you retreat, and we always love having the option to retreat.

December is the reckoning. It wouldn't be or shouldn't be if we could just recognize the cycle and not insist that we are on some linear path, where the choice is only advancement or retreat. We also should recognize the perpetual nature of desire, which is just as cyclical as time, with its seasonal nature depending on the ebb and flow of our appetites. Winter will come again; you will be hungry once again and this isn't a trap, but the pulsating proof of life. The year ends before we are ready because we are never ready; we are never satisfied.

Brilliant as always. A true holiday gift. Thank you, Tamara.

95 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?